bullentin
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 6:22 pm
- Location: Forest of Dean Gloucestershire
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 12:02 am
- Location: Llanddeusant, South Wales
Many thanks for the last couple of supportive messages.
I think the council is correct in changing from the bulletin to another method of communication, the problem though with all change is that it will upset people.
As a new reader of course I do not have the background of reading previous issues or the history attached to some of the authors. My opinions are those of a newcomer but as with most situations in life "a new broom (perhaps?) sweeps clean.
What was interesting was the strength of feeling for a publication that few readers support with articles or information.
I must though have a lot of sympathy for whoever it is that tries to change an established portion of the DCS. If my comments on the bulletin inspire such a response as they have done then I dread to think what the response would be on something far "more" important.
Good luck to the council--they will need it!
Chris
I think the council is correct in changing from the bulletin to another method of communication, the problem though with all change is that it will upset people.
As a new reader of course I do not have the background of reading previous issues or the history attached to some of the authors. My opinions are those of a newcomer but as with most situations in life "a new broom (perhaps?) sweeps clean.
What was interesting was the strength of feeling for a publication that few readers support with articles or information.
I must though have a lot of sympathy for whoever it is that tries to change an established portion of the DCS. If my comments on the bulletin inspire such a response as they have done then I dread to think what the response would be on something far "more" important.
Good luck to the council--they will need it!
Chris
Chris Downward
Pant Y Turnor
Llanddeusant
Pant Y Turnor
Llanddeusant
I am not sure where you get your ‘silent majority’ from Ted, about twenty ‘pro bulletin’, and two against. As I said before, we could probably all find something we would like to change, but I note the contributors who have experience of doing the job themselves are much less critical. Alistair gives a comprehensive answer to most of the points raised by Chris, with the advantage of having been an editor.
I have sent my e-mail in support of the Bulletin to the Council members via the office, and would ask any member who would like to maintain the Bulletin, that they do likewise. The e-mail address is: secretary@dextercattle.co.uk, and date of next Council meeting is the 24th, so please, do it now.
If it goes, a yearly periodical will not provide the support or two-way communication needed, while poor quality substitutes during the year will exacerbate the impression of a second rate Society
I have sent my e-mail in support of the Bulletin to the Council members via the office, and would ask any member who would like to maintain the Bulletin, that they do likewise. The e-mail address is: secretary@dextercattle.co.uk, and date of next Council meeting is the 24th, so please, do it now.
If it goes, a yearly periodical will not provide the support or two-way communication needed, while poor quality substitutes during the year will exacerbate the impression of a second rate Society
-
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 4:53 pm
- Location: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada